Critiques and feedback are invaluable for a writer. No matter how brilliant your prose, there's always at least one sentence that sounded great in your head, but is open to other interpretations when read. Such a sentence can drop the reader out of his trance, or worse, confuse the reader so badly that she simply quits reading. In my limited experience, such nitpicky items are not the primary cause of a failed story. Indeed, a good story line may transcend even marginal prose. You may have seen such stories written by very successful authors (and no, I won't offer my opinion of any names here). Usually, you tell your friends about such stories, "He's not a very good writer, but he spins one hell of a yarn." You can use software to proof your document and likely catch better than 60% of your grammatically bad sentences, but such software is no good at the paragraph level and useless for style considerations. IIRC, Stephen King suggested that the atomic structure ...
Herein, I blog my writing experiences. What does that have to do with a mimosa? Not only is the mimosa a drink, it is also a tree. A paper in a scientific journal from 1917 suggests the mongoose uses mimosa leaves to treat himself for snakebites. This blog is my way of doctoring my writing mishaps. - Ronald D. Ferguson